Words ending with an f can sometimes be troublesome for English speakers. They are easy enough to use in the singular, but when the time comes to transform them into plurals, things can get tricky. For some of them, as with gulf or chief, you only need to add an s to create the plural—gulfs and chiefs. With others, such as leaf and shelf, you need to replace the f with ves—leaves and shelves. But in some cases, as with the plural of calf, it seems that you can form the plural both ways. But one of the two ways has to be better than the other, right? For calf, calves is a better plural, at least for now.
Calf – Meaning and Usage
When you say calf, you can mean three different things:
1 A young mammal, usually a bovine, but also an elephant, deer, or whale:
2 The back part of your lower leg:
3 A piece of ice that broke off from a bigger iceberg or glacier:
Calves or Calfs?
As you can see from the examples, calf uses -ves ending for its plural form. Most dictionaries would agree, if you were to look it up. However, Merriam-Webster, lists calfs as an option for the plural of calf, especially when using the word as plural for calfskin. And if you think that’s a mistake, you might be surprised to find that calfs is indeed used:
While a closer look shows that calves is still the more widely used form, we cannot but wonder if this is one of the ways in which the English language is changing. After all, it does change all the time. Maybe, someday, calfs will become the dominant plural form of calf, but for now it comes second to calves. If you’re not talking about calfskin, that is.