how do i rewrite this?
how do i change the wording?
According to the internet article, Internet: A Way to Communicate-stated that the definition of communication as "having the ability to send messages or passing information from one person to another."
If this is part of a paper you are writing for school, I urge you to find a better source to reference. The definition is inaccurate. Communication is not having the ability, but actually doing it. Since this didn’t make sense, I was curious about your source. It is part of a student essay on a site that sells research papers that other students wrote.
There are two main reasons you want to stay away from these sites as a source. First, the purpose of selling these papers is for plagiarism. Second, even if you properly site the source to avoid that plagiarism charge, you have no idea if this student’s work is accurate or true. This student likely received a miserable grade for this paper, as it is poorly written. Citing this source, or any like it, will ensure a poor grade for you as well.
|link comment||edited Aug 01 '12 at 04:36 Patty T Grammarly Fellow|
I have three observations to make about plagiarism and internet research.
First, students who plagiarise think we (their teachers) are stupid, that we will never discover their dishonesty. Thirty-plus years ago as a UC Berkeley graduate teaching associate, I was involved in a plagiarism scandal. It was remarkably easy to discover the culprits. We TAs did talk to each other, and we did remember the papers turned in last semester. If anything, the internet has made uncovering plagiarism easier. And we are not stupid. (The students caught cheating failed the course.)
Second, you have no guarantee that the information you find on the internet is correct. The internet has no editors, no fact-checkers, no peer review. Anybody can post anything, and it is likely to be wrong. While researching my book, I've discovered that about two-thirds of the historical information on the internet about my topic is wrong. Why do I know that it is wrong? I've dug up the original sources materials -- and the original deeds, contracts, eyewitness diaries, field notes, and government records (many handwritten) tell a different story. Who should I believe -- the real estate agent that posts a couple paragraphs about the local history or the original records? I trust nothing on the internet unless I can verify and trust the authors. Which is more likely to be accurate: an academic paper about agriculutral mechanization by two UC Davis professors that is posted on a UC Davis College of Agriculture website, or an anonymous Wikipedia article?
Third, despite what I just said above, internet research can be a good starting point. Internet research often leads me to better and more detailed materials. Online access to the Library of Congress catalog, the Online Archive of California, and OskiCat (the UC Berkeley library catalog) is a priceless resource. Many academic journals are now published only online, and access to JSTOR.org is extremely useful. Finally, well-thought Google searches can link pieces of information where the connection may not have been obvious.
My book manuscript has several items of original scholarship that had eluded several generations of researchers. In one case, a Google search showed that a long-sought receipt from 1849 was actually catalogued (and boxed) in a different Bancroft Library collection, a collection that earlier researchers had not thought to link with my primary collection. Properly used, the internet can be a boon to research.
|link||edited Aug 01 '12 at 05:14 Jeff Pribyl Grammarly Fellow|
Hero of the day
Person asked the most questions.