Release-->Released vs. Get-->G???

0

Hello,

 

I have a question that will ultimately be used for naming some technical operations in a computer program. I am going to use analogy to describe the situation rather than technical jargon that will make your eyes bleed.

 

I am a team leader and I have a ball. There are other team leaders who want to "Get" my ball but have to wait in line until I am finished with it. While I have this ball I play a game with my team. When I  am done with the ball I "Release" it and announce that the ball is "Released". My team hears my announcement and goes to the locker room. The next team leader in line hears my announcement, grabs my ball, and announces the ball is "G???" so that his team will come out of the locker room and start playing. This ball process of "Get"-->"G???", play, "Release"-->"Released" continues until every team leader has had the ball.

 

So the question is what do I call the "G???" part? I have entertained the following:

 

"Get"-->"Got": Sounds horrible.

"Get"-->"Gotten": Sounds even worse.

"Get"-->"Acquired": Sounds great but the words are very different visually.

"Get"-->"Owned": Sounds ok but the words very different visually.

 

I feel like I am missing something here, so... um... help!

 

Thanks!

asked Jul 01 at 00:26 Jack New member

3 answers


1

They all sound bad or "different visually" because they are in a different tense than the other two. You need some parallelism. Whatever word you choose, use the simple present tense. That the other two use Get, play, release. Aquire, play, release. Own, play, release. You can also use a thesaurus to look for other words that fit each one. Take, retrieve, grab, claim / perform, execute, vie / drop, free, yield

link comment answered Jul 01 at 12:13 Patty T Grammarly Fellow
0

Hi Patty T,

 

Keeping the words in the same tense isn't an option because the past tense words are intended to reflect a state change of the ball that occured in the past. The ball can be in the "Released" state or can be in the "Acquired"/"Gotten"/"Owned"/not-sure-what-to-call-it state. The "Get" and "Release" parts of this scenario are actions (verbs) that can be performed:

 

Get(action)  --> Got? (ball state)

Release(action) --> Released (ball state)

 

In the technology world, "Get" and "Release" are standard words to use and synonyms are often frowned upon without a strong case to use them. I believe I have a strong enough case to use "Acquired" but my preference would be to use a "G"-word of some kind; thus, eliminating the need for a case. What's different about my scenario vs. other "Get" and "Release" technical implementations is that I have state change announcements while the other's do not.

 

It's possible that there is simply no "G"-word that I can use to convey the same contextual meaning as "Acquired", but I am hopeful that you are someone else can swoop in and say:

 

"Use <xxx>, it is the best option and this is why..."

 

Thanks!

link edited Jul 01 at 20:42 Jack New member

I still think that "get" should be the correct word. Though the first step happened before the second step, and the second step happened before the third, this isn't a sentence. It does not have to be grammatically correct. If it needed to show the sequence properly, you would use the past perfect tense in the first step, and the past tense in the second - "had gotten, played, release." Think of this like a caption or a headline. These are generally all written in the present tense. It is as if each word is read at precisely the moment it happens. You are creating a name, which will stay together, regardless of when it happened. You could say, "At the end of the get, play, release process, Joe forgot to release the ball." Does that help?

Patty TJul 02 at 00:56

add comment
0

Hi Patty,

 

After reading what you said and considering the options I believe this will be the optimal solution:

 

Get(action)-->Owned(state)

Release(action)-->Released(state)

 

Once a "Get" succeeds then the ball is technically owned and the concept works a little better because both tense questions can be asked without changing the words involved:

 

* Is it owned?

* Was it owned?

 

I can probably make a good case for this. Just for your own knowledge, the "ball" concept I am using is really a system object called a "mutex". Multiple asynchronous operations in a program can stand in line to "Get" it but only one can be the owner of it at any given time. Once the owner is done with it, it will "Release" its ownership of it. The "play" concept involved really means that some asynchronous operation is accessing a shared resource (usually memory) exclusively so other operations cannot interfere with that resource while it's being utilized.

 

Thanks!

link comment answered Jul 02 at 21:39 Jack New member

Your answer


Write at least 20 characters

Have a question about English grammar, style or vocabulary use? Ask now to get help from Grammarly experts for FREE.