Should we say "he is 6 foot tall" or "6 feet tall"?


Thanks in advance.

asked Jun 07 '11 at 19:19 coraliecinq New member

9 answers


I think saying "6 feet tall" is the more correct way in this case. If you say something like "he is a 6-foot-tall man", it would probably be better to say foot.

link answered Jun 07 '11 at 19:43 Contributor

Yes, I meant 6- ? -tall man. Is that foot or feet? coraliecinqJun 07 '11 at 20:59

If you want to use it this way (as an adjective), then "he's a 6-foot-tall man" would be better. :) But again, if you say "the man is 6 feet tall", feet is better. Revisery.comJun 07 '11 at 21:07

add comment

That is a pet peeve of mine. 1 is a foot. 2 or more are feet. Why do educated people say foot for feet? I don't get it.

link comment answered Sep 04 '11 at 16:27 S Madden New member

Though many people say 6 foot tall, and others say 6 feet tall, and both seem to be understood readily in everyday conversation, I would have to agree with S Madden that when speaking of 1, the singular form (foot) should be used. Two or more should take the plural form (feet). I think that a simple test tells us which one is correct. Nothing is 6 yard long, it is 6 yard(s) long. And we do not say that there are twelve inch in one foot, but twelve inches in one foot. So why when we use the word foot do we change the standard singular/plural use? Say what you want in everyday conversation, but when writing I think that it is better to stick to the norm. (1 foot, but 2 feet)

link comment edited Oct 21 '13 at 18:02 Daniel New member

          As an aside, I would also agree with When using the term as a compound adjective it does seem to look and sound better as (the 6-foot-tall man) rather than (the 6-feet-tall man), but that seems to be the only time that the singular form is better. Going back to the the same test as before (the 12-inch-long sandwich) seems to sound better and be less ambiguous than to say (the 12-inches-long sandwich).

link comment answered Oct 21 '13 at 17:58 Daniel New member

It is six-foot tall man because the "six-foot tall" is an adjective to the noun "man." 



link comment answered Jan 17 '14 at 17:49 Tim New member

Thanks.  Informative, but too complicated.  Let's just learn and use Chinese instead where there is no distinction between singular or plural.  LOL.  Other than being a pet peeve (for me as well), no one ever gets confused or interpret the meaning any different.  The meaning doesn't change a bit regardless how uneducated one is, so there is really no need for the distinction.  In Chinese, when you put a number greater than one in front of a noun, it is automatically understood as plural.  Seriously, does anyone ever get confused over "This 5 person car is not meant for 6 person, but 5 people?"   :-)

link comment answered Sep 12 '14 at 05:48 Nick Ha New member

Uhh .. You people are missing something major. What If there are inches? You say 6-foot-7, not 6-feet-7. It's not always about singular and plural. English is complex.

link comment answered Aug 04 at 11:21 Sang Vo New member

It's foot tall. The man is 1 foot 6x tall. The word feet is used for a pair of foots not 2 or more. To say the man is 6 feet is to say the man is 6 pairs of foots tall

link comment answered Aug 09 at 23:01 Charles Gentry Jr New member

Seems like no one knows the correct answer. And for those that think they know, I doubt they're 100% sure. This is a good subject to bring up with your friends and family since there is no correct answer. Google it "Is it 6 feet tall or 6 foot tall?", everyone's confused.

link comment answered Sep 18 at 06:13 Johnny Blakeman New member

Your answer

Write at least 20 characters

Have a question about English grammar, style or vocabulary use? Ask now to get help from Grammarly experts for FREE.